Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 41,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2008, 8:12 pm
You never know what people in power, who seem to disdain the sacredness of private-property rights, are capable of doing. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:46 am
(Lampi, LLC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 10:32 am
What's the upshot for Section Three and Trump v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 7:17 am
Yesterday the First Department dismissed four of six claims against former New York Stock Exchange chairman Richard Grasso finding that former Attorney General Spitzer lacked the authority to bring them (People of the State of New York, by Eliot Spitzer, the Attorney Gen. of the State of New York v Grasso, 2007 NY Slip Op 03990). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
In today's decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:25 pm
Related Cases: Rubin v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 4:49 pm
But the Supreme Court stated as early as United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Moreover, under United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
He noted that, because of his conclusion on reasonable expectation of privacy, this strictly speaking did not arise but nevertheless went on to state his finding. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 11:27 am
The Court’s six-to-two ruling in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:55 am
The Supreme Court's 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:01 am
United States, No. 08-497 (cert. petition filed Oct. 15, 2008). [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, in State of New York, et al., v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:40 am
The secretaries of state submitted that the very fact that a writ of habeas corpus would effectively require the UK Government to make a request of a foreign sovereign power was, at least in this case, a very powerful factor against it being issued. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:25 pm
For the reasons stated by the Chief Justice, advisory measures that are reasonably related to any proper use of legislative power are permissible. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
In People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:16 am
Per Lowery v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:21 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:23 am
It was also noted that the power to make such orders must be used sparingly, however, and that as this case rested on a possible breach of ECHR, art 3 it carried a different weight to one involving an article besides art 2 or art 3. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 8:38 am
Problem 11 --State of Missouri v. [read post]
