Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 6341 - 6360 of 10,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2013, 5:05 am by Susan Brenner
The TOS and the relationship between you and Yahoo shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. . . . [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  An arrest is a “seizure” for Fourth Amendment purposes, but under a case called United States v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
United States Department of Justice, 2013 U.S. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:34 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
 A 1989 Ninth Circuit case and a 2012 Ninth Circuit case reapplied the doctrine to later dissemination of technical data to foreign powers; these cases analyzed the application of the law under United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm by Florian Mueller
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis… [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:52 pm by Kevin Goldberg
More disturbingly, perhaps, we have all nine Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States on record as viewing open records laws with disdain, if not outright contempt. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm by Benjamin Wittes
And the reader would never learn a series of facts about this detainee that are, shall we say, hard to reconcile with the image of a brutalized person against whom the United States can prove no wrongdoing. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:31 am by Ryan Scoville
Even if Turkey invokes Article V, there is a strong possibility that member states, including the United States, would refuse action or sell short the action it “deems necessary,” rendering the North Atlantic Treaty somewhere between symbolic and hollow. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:44 am by Florian Mueller
The ruling was published yesterday (in Dutch), the same day that a German court gave short shrift to a Nokia v. [read post]