Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 29,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:41 am
It is not often that a court allows reargument, states that it misapplied the law, and reverses itself as took place in Orlando v Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck, P.C. [read post]
State v. Cain and State v. Simms – NJ Supreme Court Reaffirms the Role of the Jury as Trier of Facts
3 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
If you have drug charges, contact us immediately to start planning your defense. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 10:32 pm
Supreme Court called Dewsnup v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:52 am
<> Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:19 pm
The circuit court determined that the County had to: grant the extension, state a valid reason for denial, or deny the site plan on its merits. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:22 am
In Willie Mae Scott (plaintiff) v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 6:00 am
Filmmaker Overcomes Supreme Court Setback to Pursue North Carolina for Stealing Footage — Eriq Gardner has the full story about the somewhat remarkable development in Allen v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm
Voters with Facts v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:56 am
The City simultaneously discontinued its membership in the State’s Employees’ Health Plan, electing to provide coverage through the Genesee Valley Medical Health Care Plan. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 5:05 am
State Farm Auto. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:10 am
Healthnow New York Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 10:30 am
The Florida House of Representatives, et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:45 pm
Weisler & State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:14 am
Nelson, J.D.New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said his office plans to dispute the validity of a subpoena issued by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology seeking information about New York’s investigation into whether ExxonMobil Corp. may have broken state securities and other laws regarding disclosures the company allegedly made about climate change. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 4:42 pm
Cucchi In his Executive Order, President Trump directs the EPA and USACE to clarify the 2015 Waters of the United States (“WOTUS”) Rule and in doing so, to take into consideration Justice Scalia’s 2006 Supreme Court opinion in Rapanos v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:30 pm
CA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
