Search for: "State v. Word" Results 6341 - 6360 of 40,656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2021, 12:07 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The appellant also referred to a communication from the Boards of Appeal, dated 15 December 2020, which included the following wording: "From 1 January 2021 boards may conduct oral proceedings by VICO even without the agreement of the parties concerned, as has now been made clear in the new Article 15a RPBA adopted by the Boards of Appeal Committee. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
The Board also set forth (point 5.4) that, on the basis of the minutes of the oral proceedings in examination, it was at least implicit during the oral proceedings, and should have been known to the applicant, that both D1 and D2 were considered as "closest prior art".V. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am by S S
The provision does not contain the qualifying words ” within a reasonable period ” or words to similar effect. [read post]
19 May 2021, 11:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Mass. 1975) (3-judge court), and the one decision cited in that case, State v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
They implicate fundamental questions about the role of courts in the United States’s constitutional structure. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
"No official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein," Justice Robert Jackson wrote in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am by Mark C. Niles
That all changed in 1961 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Monroe v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 10:16 am by Josh Blackman
  Justice Brennan could not have stated it any better: use the word "reasonable" twice in one sentence! [read post]
18 May 2021, 8:39 am by J. Alexander Lawrence
A recent ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Lemmon v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 8:39 am by J. Alexander Lawrence
A recent ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Lemmon v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 8:39 am by J. Alexander Lawrence
A recent ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Lemmon v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:02 am by Donald Dinnie
Another American court in G & A Family Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Smokin’ Pig BBQ & Others v American Family Insurance Company 1: 20-CV-03912-JPB has held that State-imposed Covid-19 restrictions do not qualify as a “direct physical loss” under the insurance policy held by the insureds. [read post]