Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 6361 - 6380 of 15,521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2016, 8:19 pm by Walter Olson
” The President has no direct power to change libel law, which consists of state law constrained by constitutional law as laid out by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
But if not (and if the plaintiff is a public figure and the article is on a matter of public concern), then the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) in Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:00 pm
Widespread voting discrimination doesn’t only exist; it has flourished since the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The trial judge held that he was bound to follow the approach adopted by the House of Lords in the cases of Cookson v Knowles [1979] AC 556 and Graham v Dodds [1983] 1 WLR 808 and to calculate the multiplier from the date of death. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
Pulse Electronics, Inc., et al. (14-1513); and Stryker Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Holmes’s public figure status, which apparently she did not dispute, made the case much more difficult for her. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 11:17 am by Parker Higgins
The "facts", figures and motives of the lobbyists and lawmakers behind the CDA are at last being more widely examined. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:24 am
I'm not sure I'm smart enough to figure this one out.Judge Kozinski authors an opinion in August of 2015. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
 I figured it’s time to start the hibernal version, so welcome to the inaugural edition of Winter Case Notes. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
 I figured it’s time to start the hibernal version, so welcome to the inaugural edition of Winter Case Notes. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:44 am
 The earlier case, Galxo v Genentech [2008] EWCA Civ 23, was generally regarded as discouraging of stays, but the dicta was later questioned by the Supreme Court in Virgin Atlantic v Zodiac [2013] UKSC 46. [read post]