Search for: "Frank v. Frank"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 6,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
Magistrate Judge Frank Maas. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
Whether it leads to theocracy or balkanization, the creeping fusion of church and state is disastrous for the public good.Let’s be frank: religions need to obey the laws. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:54 am
Recent Protest(s) in China is(are) not the Same as Arab Spring Protests and Should Be Left to the Central Chinese Government to Handle. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:46 am
” Winters v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 12:43 pm
Renowned civil rights litigator Marshall Krause tells the story of Camara v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Since the fall of Roe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:05 am
As the SEC Chairman observed, the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd Frank") has enhanced the SEC's ability to obtain audit documentation in connection with its investigations of issuers based in China and other countries. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
" Lamie v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:05 pm
In the Court’s view, the delineation of the seditious intention offences did not inhibit open, frank, and full dialogue and debate on social issues. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
