Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
Worse still, Proposition 13 rewarded people who don’t sell their old houses – old people who are likely to be net consumers of public services – while indirectly penalizing those who do buy new houses – younger people who are likely to be net contributors to public services. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
They have failed,” he said, “to make that showing, and we thus return the power to weigh those arguments to the people and their elected representatives. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Underwood uses the scandal and misuses various people in order to further his career. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:36 pm
” Allen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
In FCC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:22 am
Strange v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 3:22 pm
Related Cases: Hachette v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 1:56 pm
In that case, Cross v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 5:42 am
Michael Bandler, MB&Co, Ltd. a/k/a Michael Bandler & Company v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 7:37 am
About 86 percent of those penalties were levied upon people of Asian descent. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 6:24 pm
One such decision is that of the Court of Appeals in People v Johnson (_ NY3d _ , 2016 NY Slip Op 02552 [4/5/16]), in which the Court rejected a defendant’s claim that the People’s use at his criminal trial of excerpts from certain recorded telephone calls defendant made to family and friends during his detention at Rikers Island Correctional Facility violated his right to counsel and were used without proper consent. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:06 am
But back in April 2012, in the iiNet case, Australia's High Court, the nation's highest, gave a clear ruling that internet service providers are not liable for authorising copyright infringement by making their services available to people who do infringe copyright and case and the Court observed that iiNet had no direct technical power to prevent its customers from using the BitTorrent system to infringe copyright in the appellants' films. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:42 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
That sounds quite a bit like the speech Citron is talking about when she says that revenge porn bans should be limited to private communications between people in a trusting relationship. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 6:24 pm
One such decision is that of the Court of Appeals in People v Johnson (_ NY3d _ , 2016 NY Slip Op 02552 [4/5/16]), in which the Court rejected a defendant’s claim that the People’s use at his criminal trial of excerpts from certain recorded telephone calls defendant made to family and friends during his detention at Rikers Island Correctional Facility violated his right to counsel and were used without proper consent. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:15 am
The record in the case, E.D. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 12:56 pm
Unfortunately, last June, the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:02 am
EFF cited a 6th Circuit case, US v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm
In some German towns and executioner was permitted three strikes (really) before being being grabbed by the crowd and forced to die in place of the poor sinner.In his concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:21 am
The only instance I remember was in 2012 or 2013: a brief exchange on Twitter regarding the monopoly power conferred by standard-essential patents. [read post]
