Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 29,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2009, 6:34 pm
But in Prowel v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:24 am
In a case that applied the 2010 United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:46 pm
" Harbison v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:44 am
Code § 230(b), Congress articulated the "specific policies" behind the adoption of the CDA: `It is the policy of the United States— (1) to promote the continued development of the Internet and other interactive computer services and other interactive media; (2) to preserve the vibra [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:41 am
(Brown II) and Jackson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:30 am
The style of the case is John Earl Bullard v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 12:13 pm
Before the United States began waiving its sovereign immunity, would-be claimants’ only recourse was to get Congress to pass a bill in their favor. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 12:13 pm
Before the United States began waiving its sovereign immunity, would-be claimants’ only recourse was to get Congress to pass a bill in their favor. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 12:13 pm
Before the United States began waiving its sovereign immunity, would-be claimants’ only recourse was to get Congress to pass a bill in their favor. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:30 pm
The court disagrees, and notes that Congress intended the TCPA to be a floor, to strengthen state regulations around intrusive text messages. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 12:22 am
The Act was introduced following the 2024 US Supreme Court case, Donald Trump v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:24 am
Congress has proposed legislative repeal; several state attorneys’ general have obtained consent decrees prohibiting such practices as per se offenses of their state antitrust laws; and Maryland repealed Leegin. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:25 am
Wagner submitted a statement about Congress’ constitutional authorization to pass the bill. [read post]
20 May 2008, 5:01 pm
Monday's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
§ 3582(c)), and even though the right to counsel applies to post-sentencing actions that affect time in custody (Mempa v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 6:08 am
§ 521(a)(1)(B)(iv), (a)(1)(B)(v), and (e)(2)(A)(i). [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:45 am
United States v. [read post]
