Search for: "State v. L. B."
Results 6361 - 6380
of 6,573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2020, 5:58 am
G.S. 7B-2052(b)(2). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
Assisted in coordinating the Produce Safety Rule oriented On-Farm Readiness Review (OFRR) training programs under the leadership of the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA), the FDA, and produce oriented professionals from several State Cooperative Extension Services2. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
Some Boards indicate that there is such a prohibition but that legitimate interest arises from e.g. broad vs narrow or from a longer term in case of internal priority (and one could also consider new states acceding to the EPC or becoming a new validation state in the priority period). [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
In Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Incidentally, one should note that with the exception of an additional point (a), the requirements in Article 8(8) points (b) to (e) mirror the article 3(9) of the AD Regulation. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
He held the position from 1947, until 1954, when he left to organize a new medical school department, of Industrial Medicine and Hygiene, in Wayne State University, in Michigan. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am
It also alleges that because the properties are part of the Hoey’s marital estate they “can be transferred/assigned” by Thomas to Wendy “as part of a separation/divorce without obtaining” Becker’s consent “[n]otwithstanding the fact that there is a partnership [sic] agreement which states that any sale and/or conveyance must be by unanimous consent. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am
It also alleges that because the properties are part of the Hoey’s marital estate they “can be transferred/assigned” by Thomas to Wendy “as part of a separation/divorce without obtaining” Becker’s consent “[n]otwithstanding the fact that there is a partnership [sic] agreement which states that any sale and/or conveyance must be by unanimous consent. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
Of course Sir Mark is not just any judge, he is a judge who was already known as humane and wise, and whose wise words about the need of society to tolerate diverse standards of parenting including the barely adequate are often quoted in court (although Sir Mark quipped wryly at the first Transparency Project conference that they were only ever quoted by the side about to lose) (see Re L (Care : Threshold Criteria) [2007] 1 FLR 2050, approved by the Supreme Court in Re B… [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Furthermore, in deciding the question of whether a bona fide emergency declaration has been made, the decision last spring in Trump v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm
Judge Paul B. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:55 am
Pealer v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
The recent Supreme Court decision in Yukon Francophone School Board, Education Area #23 v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm
B. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm
See generally Ferens v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 4:36 am
Síndico: la Junta de Control, con las excepciones indicadas en la sección 926 del título 11 del United States Code. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 6:25 am
The other woman excused herself, stating that she wanted to go shopping and inviting Bitsy along. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
After all, the legal framework of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 11 of the Securities Act is over 90 years old. [read post]
