Search for: "54 INC." Results 621 - 640 of 2,186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Morton David Goldberg, Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, New York, New York, for amici Alliance Entertainment Corp., Audible Inc., Blue Spike, Inc., The Clandestine Group, Inc., Digimarc Corporation, Digital Media on Demand, Inc., FullAudio Corporation, InterTrust Technologies Corporation, Oak Technology, Inc., Reciprocal, Inc., RioPort, Inc., RPK SecureMedia Inc., Verance Corporation, and VNU USA, Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:46 am by Eugene Volokh
iStock My research on Internet libel takedown orders has profited tremendously from the Lumen Database (formerly ChillingEffects.org), a website to which Google and others archive takedown requests. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 5:20 pm by Aurora Barnes
Medtronic, Inc. 17-625 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Civil Procedure: Third Party Discovery OrdersRogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
M-I LLC, 514 F.3d 1244, 1252–54 (Fed.Cir. 2008); and Honeywell International, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A recurring issue in securities cases involves the question of when plaintiffs may rely on the presumption of reliance under the fraud on the market doctrine. [read post]