Search for: "California Company v. Price" Results 621 - 640 of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 6:37 pm by Paul M. Secunda
 Similarly, in the United States, a recent decision from the California Employment Development Department, found an Uber driver to be an employee for purposes of eligibility for unemployment law. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:53 pm by Joe Mullin
In our view, its claims are clearly ineligible for patent protection under Alice v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
Willis contends that the real issue in Freeman is “whether the price people pay for obtaining a mortgage must be transparent. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Zoe Stern
Patnaik and Kennedy explained that imposing a price on carbon encourages companies to lower their greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
The February 8, 2010 opinion in Keller v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:48 pm by Florian Mueller
Apple's leadership recognized this and decided accordingly.Even the remaining part of the Apple-Samsung will go away at some point--I find it hard to imagine that they (meaning both companies, but particularly Apple because it started this) really want to have a third California trial in just their first lawsuit (or a fourth trial in total).For as much as Apple's supposedly "thermonuclear war on Android" underperformed my expectations, Apple's ability to… [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
” McKenna’s statement came shortly after 20 Canadian companies joined the Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (CPLC), an organization that leverages business and government entities to fight climate change. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 1:14 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Above the Law Don’t Roll The Dice On Defamation Suits Against Gripe Sites, Especially In California–Ocean’s Eleven v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:16 am by Blake E. Reid
The only case cited by the RNC is a 1979 California Supreme Court case, Goldin v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 10:30 am by Andrew Hamm
California, a state court in California ruled that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994, which expressly preempts any state law “related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier … with respect to the transportation of property,” did not preempt California’s “ABC test. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
A.D. 2003), as authority for rejecting "price inflation" as speculative. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
United States Denton’s Privacy and Cybersecurity law Blog has analysed California’s much debated California Consumer Privacy Act 2018. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:02 pm by Dan Flynn
District Court for Northern California, which is how the case on appeal went to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]