Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2014, 1:00 pm
Design patents are an Apple v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
” McKenna’s statement came shortly after 20 Canadian companies joined the Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (CPLC), an organization that leverages business and government entities to fight climate change. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Ramos in Stulman v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 1:14 pm
Above the Law Don’t Roll The Dice On Defamation Suits Against Gripe Sites, Especially In California–Ocean’s Eleven v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:48 pm
Apple's leadership recognized this and decided accordingly.Even the remaining part of the Apple-Samsung will go away at some point--I find it hard to imagine that they (meaning both companies, but particularly Apple because it started this) really want to have a third California trial in just their first lawsuit (or a fourth trial in total).For as much as Apple's supposedly "thermonuclear war on Android" underperformed my expectations, Apple's ability to… [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 10:30 am
California, a state court in California ruled that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994, which expressly preempts any state law “related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier … with respect to the transportation of property,” did not preempt California’s “ABC test. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
A.D. 2003), as authority for rejecting "price inflation" as speculative. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:02 pm
District Court for Northern California, which is how the case on appeal went to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
United States Denton’s Privacy and Cybersecurity law Blog has analysed California’s much debated California Consumer Privacy Act 2018. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:38 pm
Supreme Court enunciated in Morrison v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 4:24 pm
The purchase price of the 2006 Ford truck in question was $43,084.68. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:29 am
As discussed at length here, both the Ninth Circuit and the California state courts upheld the finding of continuing state court jurisdiction for ’33 Act claims in connection with the Luther v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:28 am
More recently, I found out about a bunch of VoiceAge v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
The Company’s stock price decreased by approximately 21% the day after this announcement. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:31 am
Kiobel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:11 am
The plaintiffs further allege that after the companies’ share prices were inflated, the individual defendants unloaded their personal holdings in the companies’ securities for a substantial profit. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
Waters v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm
In both cases the judges dismissed the epidemiological evidence and directed summary verdicts for the tobacco companies.38” Golan 2011 at 11 & n. 38 (citing Pritchard v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:04 am
For example, last summer, the California Supreme Court ruled in an employment lawsuit of Grande v. [read post]
