Search for: "Chancellor v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 1,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Addressing the penalty imposed on VHB, termination, the Appellate Division said that “the penalty of termination is not excessive” and denied VHB’s appeal in its entirety. * See “letter of agreement” from NYC Department of Education Chancellor Klein to UFT President Michael Mulgrew dated April 15, 2010 concerning the processing and resolution of disciplinary charges filed against an educator employed by the New York City Department of Education pursuant… [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
The counterterrorism strategy session held in Germany will include German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Francois Hollande, British Prime Minister David Cameron, and Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:03 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
UC San Diego Chancellor, Executive Vice Chancellor and the Vice Chancellors Perhaps the chalking was on sidewalks that were covered by overhangs, and thus forbidden; when I asked Provost Evans about this, he referred the matter to the Chancellor’s Office, and when I asked them, they just forwarded me the chancellor’s statement that I just quoted. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
A tenured employee who resigns from his or her position and is subsequently reemployed by his or her former employer in the same title is not automatically entitled to tenure in the positionSpringer v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:04 am by randywallace
  The chancellor found the removal was improper stating “[t]he only purpose for removal of the minor’s settlement . . . was for Defendants to engage in forum shopping and delay the final outcome of this matter. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:42 pm by Carl Neff
In the recent decision of Louisiana Municipal Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]