Search for: "DEFENDANT DOE 1-10" Results 621 - 640 of 12,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2016, 7:46 am by MBettman
Article I, Section 10 of the Ohio Constitution (No person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.) [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm by Orin Kerr
The question is, how does the fact of third-party possession change the legal framework? [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 6:09 am by John Day
 When reviewing a trial court's grant of remittitur, Tennessee appellate courts will conduct a three-step review consisting of (1) the trial court's reasons for granting a remittitur; (2) the amount of the reduction to ensure it does not destroy the jury's verdict; (3) the evidence related to damages to assess whether the proof is consistent with the remittitur. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
THE STATE DOES NOT DISPUTE THAT THE 1995 POLICY DOES NOT PROHIBIT THE DISTRICT COURT FROM APPOINTING THE FEDERAL DEFENDER........................................ 13 IV. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
The trial court sentenced defendant to concurrent terms of 3 to 20 years' imprisonment, with credit for 10 days. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:28 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
In a footnote, the court says that the Hague Convention’s reference to “postal channels” does not include email, and a country’s objections to Article 10 do not prevent email service. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 2:38 pm by John W. Arden
Court of Appeals in San Francisco has ruled (In re: Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation, April 10, 2013, Bea, C.). [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Defendants also point to Praluent's label stating that "[t]he recommended starting does for Praluent is 75 mg. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 10:45 am by Brian Shiffrin
Nevertheless, once the officer asked if there was anything in the vehicle he "should be aware of," the encounter became a common-law inquiry under De Bour, requiring a "founded suspicion that criminal activity is afoot" (De Bour, 40 NY2d at 223; see generally Garcia, 20 NY3d at ___ n 1; People v Ponder, 43 AD3d 1398, 1399, lv denied 10 NY3d 770). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:04 pm by admin
(c) “Insurer” has the same meaning as set forth in section 10-1-102, C.R.S. [read post]