Search for: "DOES 1-245"
Results 621 - 640
of 699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The Commission also said that “the fact that a registrant is exposed to a material transition risk does not necessarily result in its … emissions being de facto material to the registrant. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The preliminary inquiry can be used to reveal such inadequacies that show that despite first appearances, the prosecution really does not have, “a case of probable guilt,” and therefore, there should not be a committal for trial.[5] Trials are too expensive in human resources to be leaving such issues entirely to trials, especially a jury trial requiring the jury to be absent from the court during long “admissibility voir dires. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
Under Art. 25(1) the transfer of personal data can take place only if the third country ensures an adequate level of protection of such data. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:27 am
[1] A recent English study estimated that a five percent reduction in travel time could generate five billion U.S. dollars in savings per year. [2] While no similar research has been commenced in the United States, American urban citizens lost 3.7 billion hours of time and wasted 2.3 billion gallons of fuel sitting in congested streets in 2003. [3] The approaches to alleviating congestion can be divided into two main schools of thought: 1)… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Litig., 289 F.Supp. 2d 1230, 1236 n.1 (W.D. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Berardi, 54 A.D.3d at 984-985, 865 N.Y.S.2d 245 this Court concluded that, absent a provision in the stipulation specifically awarding the [wife] accident disability benefits, the Supreme Court had erred in amending the QDRO to award the wife a portion of the husband's pension representing compensation for personal injuries, as such a provision in the QDRO expanded the rights granted to the wife under the stipulation. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:53 pm
Maxwell, 588 F.3d 245, 251 (4th Cir. 2009). [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
Murphy Co., 46 Ohio St. 2d 245, 348 N.E.2d 144 (1976) (a private cause of action should not be interpreted into a statute absent the clear intent by the legislature to create such a remedy.) [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
(a)(1).) [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
”[1] Before 1964, this rulemaking power was directed to the FTC’s administrative functions. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Courts consider whether purchasers: were on notice of the terms; and actually or implicitly assented to them.[1] Applying this framework, courts generally enforce clickwrap agreements because they require purchasers to physically manifest assent — e.g., clicking an “I accept” button that explicitly indicates assent to the terms of use.[2] In contrast, since browsewrap agreements do not require explicit physical assent, courts typically will only find them enforceable if… [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Comments may be submitted online by September 1, 2017. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
So what does a court do with that conflict? [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:06 am
Thus, the imposed treaty is absolutely void in its entirety and ab initio (VCLT, Articles 44(5), 69(1)). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 12:47 pm
Elements of a Churning Claim There are three basic elements that must be proven in order to prevail in a churning case Those elements are (1) control, (2) excessive trading, and (3) scienter (see, e.g. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
The SEC is seeking a budget of $1.566 billion, an increase of $245 million over the agency’s FY 2012 appropriation. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:21 am
., [1] reaffirmed the value of the poison pill to boards seeking to protect and maximize stockholder value. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
Barnett, 245 N.C. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 2:59 pm
Q: Who does the public charge rule apply to? [read post]
