Search for: "Doe v. Holder" Results 621 - 640 of 6,694
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2022, 9:52 am by Nick Austin and Sofia Papaspyropoulou
By virtue of OBG Ltd v Allan [2007] UKHL 21 and Your Response Ltd v Datateam Business Media Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 281, a trade document in electronic form is intangible and, therefore, not possessable and capable of functioning as a paper trade document. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
“I have an Article II, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 8:36 pm by Ray Giblett (AU) and Timothy Chan (AU)
The regime proposes imposing obligations on CASSPrs similar to those obligations currently applying to AFSL holders. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:38 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  Therefore Article 3(c) serves to prevent the situation whereby a patent holder could obtain a new SPC each time it placed on the market a medicinal product containing the active ingredient protected as such by the holder’s basic patent and another substance which does not constitute the subject matter of the invention. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm by Guy-Uriel Charles
Supreme Court case as vividly presents the important symbiotic relationship between structural political inequality and structural racial inequality as does Gomillion v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 7:39 am by Jason Rantanen
Litigation ensues, both as to the SEP holder’s compliance with its FRAND commitment, and the implementer’s infringement of the SEPs (given that it does not yet have a license). [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor does the fact that defendants signed a stipulation on plaintiff’s behalf, releasing the holder of the escrow account from liability, constitute malpractice. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 10:36 am by Eric Goldman
Heldman * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe * Video Excerpts Qualify as Fair Use (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. [read post]