Search for: "Does 1 to 20" Results 621 - 640 of 28,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2013, 12:01 pm by oliver randl
The Board found this claim not to comply with A 123(2):[2.1] The feature of claim 1 “wherein said stretching members (5) extend in said contacting portion (20), in the vicinity of the fold and in said standing portion (10), respectively;” (specified as “feature (iii)” in the following text) results, in particular with regard to the wording “in the vicinity of the fold”, in subject-matter which does not meet the requirement of A 123(2).… [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
§705(20), [§504] differ from the definition of “disability” for the purposes of claims advanced pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Claim 1 of the patent as maintained by the Examining Division read (in English translation; the amendments with respect to the claim as granted are underlined):Method for manufacturing a clutch cage of a double clutch (1), characterized by the following method steps:rolling a toothing system (20) into a sheet metal strip (21 ) by means of two rolls (28,29) arranged on both sides of the sheet metal strip (21), wherein the two rolls (28, 29) have an outer contour… [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am by Woodrow Pollack
Unidentified Parties - Does 1-20The Accused Infringers last sought dismissal of the 20 parties identified only as Does 1-20. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am by Woodrow Pollack
Unidentified Parties - Does 1-20The Accused Infringers last sought dismissal of the 20 parties identified only as Does 1-20. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:44 am by Andy Taylor
Rogers, and John/Jane Does 1-99 for breach of express contract, breach of implied contract, breach of implied warranty, negligence, strict (product) liability, and fraud. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
If the latter is taken into consideration there will be many more factual situations in which a claimant will struggle to obtain interim relief unless the court then redresses the balance by looking beyond 'balance of convenience' towards the likelihood that a defendant will be able to establish that his sign does (or does not infringe). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:23 am
Your attorney is there to make sure that the offer does not fall outside of what the law allows. [read post]