Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 621 - 640
of 4,586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 11:17 pm
UPDATE, 1:41 a.m.: Earlier video here. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:53 pm
(1) Does this help answer my first question? [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
Rule 41(a)(1) allows for the plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.Original Post:We recently wrote about Zynga, the developer of online social games, bringing a claim in the beginning of June against John Does 1-5 because of the defendants’ use of a domain name that allegedly infringed on Zynga’s trademark. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:44 am
I wonder if A-1 and Mountain Dew might be a bit concerned about their product placements thank to Cooey. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:06 am
Here is the list: 1. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:25 pm
The Court further finds that on November 1, 1990, while acting as an undercover police officer, Detective was introduced to defendant in apartment 6B, at 41-13 10th Street, by a female,. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:34 am
This rule does not apply to the extent the amount paid or incurred is directly connected with an unrelated trade or business which is regularly carried on by the organization.Note. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 23 NY3d at 247; see NY Const, art V, § 1; State Finance Law § 8 [1], [2], [2-b], [3], [7]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 23 NY3d at 247; see NY Const, art V, § 1; State Finance Law § 8 [1], [2], [2-b], [3], [7]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 23 NY3d at 247; see NY Const, art V, § 1; State Finance Law § 8 [1], [2], [2-b], [3], [7]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 23 NY3d at 247; see NY Const, art V, § 1; State Finance Law § 8 [1], [2], [2-b], [3], [7]). [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
Based on the above, I come to the conclusion that the preferment of an indictment on its own does not confer on an accused the right (let alone constitutional right) to a jury trial as now contended by the Applicant. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
The GUIs at issue in THJWhat does originality in copyright law mean? [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:38 pm
Brief for Petitioner 41, n. 12, and could benefit from briefing and argument in an appropriate case. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:56 pm
It also found claim 79 of the ’357 patent and claim 1 of the ’030 patent invalid based on obviousness. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
L. 1-50 (2017).33. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 8:35 am
The judges also cited the Primart decision, where the CJEU held that-- where the earlier trade mark and the sign whose registration is sought coincide in an element that is weakly distinctive with regard to the goods at issue, the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion within the meaning of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 does not often lead to a finding that such likelihood exists. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 6:47 pm
It does not follow, however, that the proponent is entitled to the particulars as demanded. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:24 am
Textor, 41 Fla. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:52 pm
Claim 2 at issue de- pends from claim 1. [read post]
