Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2019, 3:45 am
Does the finding that (a disclosure in) a prior art document D1 does not qualify as an accidental anticipation (thus not allowing the use of an undisclosed disclaimer) because it does not fulfill the criterion laid down in G 1/03 that it is so unrelated to and remote from the claimed invention that the skilled person would never have taken it into consideration when making the invention, imply that it is automatically relevant for inventive step? [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Kat Eleonora Rosati reports on the DSM directive's publication on the Official Journal of the European Union: it is now Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
at 1). [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:05 am
The announcement of the registration caused Bitcoin SV to surge 56%, rising to $96. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
Hacker, 83 N.Y. 1, 8 n.1 (1993). [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
18 May 2019, 6:46 am
Ah 1, ah 2.... [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
The interests of the children The court does not appear to have properly considered the interests of the children involved in this case. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:47 pm
Part 1 of this post will address the proper approach to anonymity in personal injury proceedings since the decision in JXMX. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:32 pm
This does not present a straightforward issue in nuisance, but it was not one addressed on appeal, as the High Court notes: 77. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:29 am
The fact that the regulation was actually adopted a few months after the InfoSoc Directive does not mean anything: the text of what is currently Article 96(2) was already present in the first proposal of 1993. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
The purpose of the continuous representation doctrine is to avoid forcing a client to jeopardize the relationship with the attorney handling his or her case during the period that the attorney continues to represent them (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 7 [1st Dept 2009], af(d, 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 12:33 pm
” Restitution and damages aren’t the same thing, “even if the process of calculating them might (and often does) lead to the same result. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 11:13 pm
The concrete measures to be taken depend on each individual case (see decision of 11 October 2017 in Case I ZP 96/16). [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 10:37 am
” [18] The Incidence of Listeria Infections Listeria bacteria are found widely in the environment in soil, including in decaying vegetation and water, and may be part of the fecal flora of a large number of mammals, including healthy human adults. [4, 18] According to the FDA, “studies suggest that 1-10% of humans may be intestinal carriers of Listeria. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:41 pm
§ 296(1)(a). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 11:42 am
The New Bill 148 One of the interesting parts of this new law deals with scheduling and on-call work.[1] In essence, this law states that generally if the employer demands that the employee work on an unscheduled day, it must provide at least 3 hours pay and at least 96 hours of advance notice. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 11:42 am
The New Bill 148 One of the interesting parts of this new law deals with scheduling and on-call work.[1] In essence, this law states that generally if the employer demands that the employee work on an unscheduled day, it must provide at least 3 hours pay and at least 96 hours of advance notice. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am
Furthermore, s 96(1) addresses a different aspect of renewed claims, because it applies where a person relies on a matter that could have been raised in an earlier appeal but has no satisfactory reason for not doing so. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 5:19 pm
& Tax Code §§ 17941(a), 23153(d)(1). [read post]
