Search for: "Ex Parte Scott"
Results 621 - 640
of 960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 7:27 am
Certainly, a third party may still resort to ex parte reexamination (EXP), but that option is much less attractive for third party requesters based on historical results. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:17 am
No. 578 at Ex. 17.) [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:28 am
Issue: Darryl’s Ex-wife Description: Darryl and Kevin made several highly inappropriate and potentially defamatory comments about Darryl’s ex-wife. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
(see ex parte Request No. 12)). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
(see ex parte Request No. 12)). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:37 am
A request for reexamination of Intel’s patent was filed last Monday (see ex parte Request No. (1)). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:37 am
A request for reexamination of Intel’s patent was filed last Monday (see ex parte Request No. (1)). [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Fletcher (1866), L.R. 1 Ex. 265, aff’d (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330 for that loss. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
La procédure d’examen supplémentaire suivra sensiblement la procédure de réexamen ex parte (cf. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
Sony has now replied to that suit by requesting reexamination of theWalker patent (see ex parte Request No. (10)). [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
Sony has now replied to that suit by requesting reexamination of theWalker patent (see ex parte Request No. (10)). [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
Le tiers requérant ne peut rester anonyme, comme dans la procédure ex parte (cf. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:21 am
One might argue that the above scenario exists today, such as when ex parte patent reexamination runs in parallel. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:21 am
One might argue that the above scenario exists today, such as when ex parte patent reexamination runs in parallel. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:55 am
Issue: Darryl’s Ex-wife Description: Darryl and Kevin made several highly inappropriate and potentially defamatory comments about Darryl’s ex-wife. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:16 am
An unnamed party filed a request against a Round Rock Researchpatent for electronic tracking (see ex parte Request No. (12)). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:16 am
An unnamed party filed a request against a Round Rock Researchpatent for electronic tracking (see ex parte Request No. (12)). [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
Here is the latest installment of Reexamination Requests from Scott Daniels, of Reexamination Alert and Practice Center Contributor… Requests for reexamination were filed against four RFID patents owned by patent-holding/enforcement company Round Rock Research (see ex parte Request Nos. (1), (2), (4), & (5)). [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
Here is the latest installment of Reexamination Requests from Scott Daniels, of Reexamination Alert and Practice Center Contributor… Requests for reexamination were filed against four RFID patents owned by patent-holding/enforcement company Round Rock Research (see ex parte Request Nos. (1), (2), (4), & (5)). [read post]
