Search for: "Federal v. Levine"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Levine, but doesn’t really explain itself. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:49 am
Levine. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:43 pm
Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:48 am
In Christison v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm
Allen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:49 am
” In determining whether the Community Group constituted a party in interest, the Bankruptcy Court began its analysis by looking to the test federal courts use to determine standing, quoting Lujan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
In Levin v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
Supreme Court’s June 23, 2011, 5-4 landmark decision in PLIVA Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
V. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Daum v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:39 am
In Riegel v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:03 am
However, the FDA’s preemption analysis in that preamble had already been nuked by the Supreme Court in Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:22 am
[The case, in the Southern District of NY, is captioned “Puerto 80 Projects v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Levin, a satellite television provider is challenging the constitutionality of an Ohio law that imposes greater taxes on it than on cable television companies doing business in that state, while in Sandy Creek Energy Associates v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:38 am
Levine, which found express Congressional intent not to preempt state laws. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:17 am
Bank v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
Levin (10-1322); Sandy Creek Energy v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:14 pm
Levine (20) Widespread shortages of hospital drugs (8) Hospital drug shortages, cont’d (11) FDA overwarning (0) [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:16 am
Smith, et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:32 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2008), the Supreme Court held that the same kind of suit against manufacturers of brand-name prescription drugs is not preempted by federal law. [read post]
