Search for: "German v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 3,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
Recently, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in CW Zumbiel v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:32 pm by Florian Mueller
In a Q&A document accompanying its Monday announcement of a Statement of Objections (SO) against Google's Motorola's pursuit of injunctions against Apple (and creation of an agreement under allegedly-abusive circumstances) the European Commission stated in no uncertain terms its disagreement with some of the terms certain German courts have in recent years imposed on implementers of FRAND standards if they wanted to avoid sales bans under the Orange-Book-Standard framework. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Gutehoffnungshutte GmbH, 141 F.3d 1434 (11th Cir. 1998) (German manufacturer was party to the arbitration); Yusuf Ahmed Alghanim & Sons, WLL v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
The relevant public by reference to which the absolute ground for refusal must be assessed is the average consumer in the Member State in which the place designated by a GI is situated. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 am by Florian Mueller
In its offensive German cases (though not in the defensive ones, where OPPO is relying on the same firm as Apple against Ericsson: Hogan Lovells), OPPO is represented by Bardehle Pagenberg's Professor Tilman Mueller-Stoy ("Müller-Stoy" in German).A court in Chongqing, China, has already held a first hearing in the OPPO v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
They led the way into Normandy on D-Day, and stopped the Germans cold in the Battle of the Bulge and bailed Ike out. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
This week at the ACCA: The Army CCA will hear oral argument in one case this week, on Thursday, April 19, 2012, in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:41 am
While we are still digesting the ECJ’s guidance concerning AdWords in eBay v L’Oreal (C-324/09, see the IPKat's post here) the German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) has today finally published its eagerly and long awaited decision in Eis.de (otherwise known as the Bananabay case: see our earlier reports here, here and here).The decision was already handed down in January 2011 but was only published today, with impeccable timing by Germany’s highest… [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
 German IP blogs. [read post]