Search for: "Givens v. City of Chicago" Results 621 - 640 of 674
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:55 pm
City of Chicago, docket 08-1497). [read post]
14 May 2009, 3:27 am
This Article deals with several objections to pursuing its topic, and then presents a series of examples: Police Department of Chicago v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 7:10 pm
As for the U.S. city the most Nazi deportation cases in our federal courts: Chicago. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 4:59 am
New York City Health and Hospitals Corp - $83,000 jury award for future pecuniary loss for the death of a 12 day old infant went unchallenged on appeal Kruger v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:33 am
A story in the Chicago Tribune today contains this quote:The Indiana Supreme Court is expected to rule in the coming days on which judge has jurisdiction over the case.Well, the Supreme Court acted last evening, at 8:20 PM, issuing an Order in the case of Curley v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:21 am
If the government's statutory construction is correct and the statute criminalizes violating a website TOS, then the statute is void for vagueness because it fails to provide warning of what is prohibited and ensures discriminatory enforcement under City of Chicago v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
Bd. of Educ.of the City of Chicago, No. 07-2084 In the context of enforcing a consent decree governing the placement of disabled students in Chicago schools, a district court order is not ripe for review where defendant-school board has not shown that the order will necessarily result in harm. . [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
The occasion was another season final: Lakers v. 76ers, June 2001. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in recent… [read post]