Search for: "Grand Jury Matter, in Re" Results 621 - 640 of 1,177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2011, 9:47 am by Matt Brown
Secret grand juries, presumptions against bail, and mandatory minimums don’t seem so bad when you don’t care about the person who bears the brunt of the rules. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm by Schachtman
Statisticians do not simply look at two statistics, such as the actual and expected percentage of blacks on a grand jury, and make a subjective conclusion that the statistics are significantly different. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 3:51 am by SHG
Witnesses before grand juries wind up talking to the media, for example, or those witnesses may file court actions to try to block the investigation. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
MI Dept Nat Res    Western District of Michigan at Grand RapidsKENNEDY, Circuit Judge. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 8:11 pm
On 7 October 2002, a subsequent grand jury indicted defendant for robbery of currency valued at approximately $3.00 from Carlson perpetrated through use of a dangerous weapon at the time of the assault. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:47 pm by Stewart Baker
 We’re all a little uncomfortable with the new places that information technology is taking us. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 11:37 am by Quinta Jurecic
(The footnotes to portions of the text describing claims by Manafort are still redacted, and are labeled in the original report as redacted grand jury material—consistent with court documents that show Manafort testified twice before the grand jury.) [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  An acquittal is entered into the record when the finder of fact, either a judge or jury depending on the circumstances, returns a not guilty verdict. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 12:58 pm by Dave Maass
(Madera County Grand Jury)  EFF began investigating CLETS after reviewing official “misuse statistics” presented in public hearings that made little sense and did not seem to reflect misuse at all. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am by Jacob Schulz
The grand jury tacked on a teaching or demonstrating use of explosive materials charge for “Captain Hutaree” and his son. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:55 am by Stephen Gillers
On Monday, the Supreme Court will hear opposing answers to that question in a case known as In re Grand Jury. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:47 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Another CIA officer, who goes by the nickname "Chili," also came up at the grand jury, one witness said. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:47 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Another CIA officer, who goes by the nickname "Chili," also came up at the grand jury, one witness said. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:34 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The new grand-jury indictment — product of a federal investigation that began nearly three years ago — charges that Mastro, anticipating bankruptcy, engaged in a series of illegal transactions aimed at putting several valuable assets off-limits to creditors. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 4:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, for the reasons set forth hereinabove, this Court determines, as a matter of fact and law, that defendant sustained his burden of proof under C.P.L. 400.21. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 9:57 pm
By testifying before a grand jury, they blatantly disregard the crucial role that confidential informers play in informing citizens in a free society. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:36 am
I think the charges can be, as they have been, put together in a fashion that will survive a motion to dismiss based on the premise that "this ain't a crime," but I don't think they make sense in terms of law or policy.Last January, I raised the grand jury investigation into Megan's death with the students in my cybercrime class and we analyzed how section 1030 COULD be used against Lori Drew. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm by Jackie McDermott
And you have Justice Breyer saying, ‘Justice Kagan, you say you're following the historical tradition about the insanity defense. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd
… [C]ompelling one of the President’s immediate advisers to testify on a matter of executive decision-making would also raise serious con­stitutional problems, no matter what the assertion of congressional need. [read post]