Search for: "I.S. V. STATE"
Results 621 - 640
of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2012, 8:05 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:07 pm
Part V concludes by outlining Spinoza’s lasting contribution to the theory of international relations and law. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 12:00 am
" It is worth noting that despite the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:42 pm
The Fifth Circuit affirmed on the basis of res judicata [i.e. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
On this basis, Zurich argued that it was liable to IEG only for a proportionate amount of the full claim (i.e. 6/27). [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:46 am
Like the previous case addressing conflicts between state and federal bank regulators, Watters v. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 7:30 am
Brief of Members of Congress as Amici Curiae on Behalf of Respondents in the Matter Trump v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:32 pm
On May 14, a judge in the Northern District of California granted in part and dismissed in part four motions to dismiss filed by defendants in the consolidated class action, Opperman v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:03 am
The County sought to enforce state administrative regulations concerning “greywater” (i.e., water used in dishwashing, laundry, and the like) so as to prevent pollution of water resources, insisting that the community install the required and more modern system. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:34 pm
Panchenko v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm
Specifically, the court agreed with Petitioner’s contentions that SWRCB lacked authority under Porter-Cologne to adopt a statewide WQCP under its policy-making authority and was instead limited to establishing statewide WQCPs for only for those areas specifically identified by Porter-Cologne—i.e., “Waters of the United States” and for “ocean waters,” including non-federal ocean waters. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 8:13 am
Twitter; PragerU v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:54 am
State of Utah In Re: M.G., M.G. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:25 am
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:37 am
The decision, Cassotto v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Blueford v. [read post]
