Search for: "In Interest of HB" Results 621 - 640 of 1,476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2015, 4:35 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Bill Zedler filed legislation this year, HB 2623, which would disallow state prosecutors from using federal forfeiture unless the amount is over $50,000, it's an interstate crime, or the property may only be seized under federal law.If the committee simply amended SB 95 with the text from Mr. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 2:19 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
”  But HB 624 would change that, and would require a bond posted from anyone charged with cruelty to animals. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
Federal Register Highlights  The following is an alert of Environmental Federal Register announcements that may be of interest. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:26 am by HS_admin
Last week, HB 15-1259 was introduced to the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Livestock & Natural Resources. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:08 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Duane Bohac (HB 3165) would require the government to obtain a warrant to use "stingray" devices to intercept cell phone calls and subscriber data. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm by Jason Shinn
However, proposed HB 4198 would outright void a noncompete restriction between an employer and employee. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 11:58 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Bryan Hughes yesterday filed HB 2263 - a reprise of his HB 1608 last session which garnered 107 joint and coauthors in the House - which would require warrants for law enforcement to access cell phone location data, and there is interest (including among law enforcement interests) in potentially amending the bill language to include Stingrays (a trade name, the technical term is "IMSI catchers") before everything is said and done.There's nothing… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
’ Citing Tape Recording, House Committee on Judiciary, Subcommittee 1, HB 2795, May 6, 1985, Tape 576 (statement of Sterling Gibson, General Telephone Co.).State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Alaska lawmakers apparently have no interest in regulating the state’s latest foodie craze. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That’s right, Thus, prosecutors cannot step in to protect the interests of children and deter their deaths. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:02 pm by Dan Flynn
HB 245 would allow farms with 15 or fewer cows, 30 or fewer goats, and 30 or fewer sheep to largely regulate themselves. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 10:04 am by HS_admin
Representative Kit Roupe (R-Colorado Springs) introduced HB 15-1113 has introduced the first truly HOA friendly bill of the session. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:34 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Pursuant to HB 1318 passed last session, the Texas Indigent Defense Commission commissioned a study (pdf) of indigent defense caseloads by the Public Policy Research Institute at Texas A&M. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
While Blake said he’d like the proposal to get a hearing, he called it an “interesting and potentially difficult bill. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 2:17 pm by HS_admin
  As introduced, the bill: •    Removes communities with less than 200 units from the definition of Common Interest Community. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:22 am by Molly Foley-Healy
 In a nutshell, if passed, HB 1040 would provide:  ●          That individuals who manage common interest communities with less than 200 units, commercial common interest communities and time share common interest communities would not be required to be licensed as community association managers by the Division of Real Estate. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:04 pm by Larry
I am similarly happy with a Dixon Ticonderoga HB 2, which seems to remove more of the mark. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:54 am by WIMS
Federal Register Highlights  The following is an alert of Environmental Federal Register announcements that may be of interest. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am by Giles Peaker
The expectation that Parliament should have expressly ruled out the relevance of the overcrowding provisions was wrong in law because i) the well established approach known to Parliament that when it enacts a statutory test that uses familiar and ordinary English words, and does not define them, the court construes and applies the test in the way set out in paragraph 19 above, and ii) in these cases the statement made by Lord Freud to the Grand Committee of the House of Lords on 15 October 2012… [read post]