Search for: "In Re Brady"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2015, 8:27 pm
We call the group “The Bradys” because it started out with a Greg, a Jan, a Cindy, and a Marsha (no kidding). [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Or sixths, if we’re talking about Friedman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
Cain, 14-10008 (seventh) asks questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel; Taylor v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Mike Ostermeyer works in the Milwaukee office of Quarles & Brady. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 12:33 pm
I'm the guy that brought the Brady bill into — into focus and became law. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
All we’re saying is that … the same rule applies to Rule 48(a) if we have brought the charge…. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:14 am
In the case of In Re The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 3:32 pm
In Re Atheros Communications Inc. [read post]
29 May 2016, 6:18 am
Jeff Brady Bob at Zion National Park. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
Brady v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:35 am
From there it’s up to the agency to determine if they’re public documents or not. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:04 am
Maryland Court: You’re still liable. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:35 am
From there it’s up to the agency to determine if they’re public documents or not. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
A day in the life of a Kat:from Playboy bunny to ...In late 2017 The IPKat reported that, after Europe, it appeared that the interplay between linking and copyright protection had re-surfaced also in the US [use of the term 're-surfaced' is justified in light of the fact that US courts have already had the chance to address these issues, eg in the well-known Perfect 10 case].After a few months, earlier this week two decisions have been issued on this matter ... with two… [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
And if your client is the target of cooperation (and you’re skeptical of the government’s Brady / Giglio compliance), worry about what the Judiciary’s good-hearted efforts to protect cooperators will mean for your efforts to investigate the government’s witnesses against your client. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:22 pm
See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 16; Brady v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:19 pm
I don’t care if you’re the Brady Bunch or that prototypically dysfunctional family, money seems to have a way of bringing out the worst in people. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
This same court case re-emphasizes the nauseating Virginia rule that: "'There is no general constitutional right to discovery in a criminal case.' Spencer v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
(13) Whether the government withheld exculpatory evidence (certain intercepted phone calls, emails, an indictment filed against coconspirators in New York, proffer statements from one of coconspirators and impeachment evidence against a coconspirator) in violation of Brady v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:07 pm
But they're different, right? [read post]
