Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2013, 8:59 pm
It’s important to know the signs of nursing home abuse and what you can do if you’re concerned about a loved one. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:22 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has dredged up an old Kentucky opinion from 2003, United State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:48 am
Kerr’s A Theory of Law, by Ross E. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am
Wydra, in which they argue that “the preclearance requirement contained in Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act seeks to enforce the core purpose of the Fifteenth Amendment, and the nearly unanimous, bipartisan decision of Congress to re-authorize it falls squarely within Congress’s broad power to enforce the Fifteenth Amendment. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 3:52 pm
Catherine Kerr's research on mindfulness was in the news. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
Kerr has looked to three sources: code-based restrictions, contract-based restrictions, and norms-based restrictions. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
Kerr has looked to three sources: code-based restrictions, contract-based restrictions, and norms-based restrictions. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
(Orin Kerr, at Volokh, had a discussion of the new cases when they came out.) [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:38 am
Within Ex parte Kerr To teach away, prior art must “criticize, discredit, or otherwise discourage the solution claimed. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:26 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses a good ruling out of the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:04 am
Either they're simple or not, and if the former, then no interpretation is needed. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 3:48 am
We're doomed. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:00 am
Important is the obligations it places on others, but also be aware of all reasonable steps clause re links etc. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:28 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve mostly stayed out of the Posner v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am
On Friday, I will try to outflank Orin Kerr from the right, by summarizing the parts of the book that call for the immediate end to the exclusionary rule. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:32 am
(Orin Kerr) The decision is In re INNOVATIO IP VENTURES, LLC PATENT LITIGATION. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:05 am
In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC Patent Litigation, No. 11 C 9308 (N.D. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:08 pm
(Orin Kerr) The decision is In re INNOVATIO IP VENTURES, LLC PATENT LITIGATION. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:10 am
He understands what we’re about, and he’s very hands-on and curious about what we’re trying to do. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
Maryland is controlling) 2) In re Application of the United States (D.D.C. [read post]
