Search for: "In re John H." Results 621 - 640 of 1,537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Karim Benyekhlef and Nicolas Vermeys
We’re not advocating for a new legal system, simply new legal objects and tools. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
After all, the notion was that a few Republicans would think something like this: OK, so I stuck by Trump when he attacked John McCain’s heroism—not just once but even after McCain’s death. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
She said, “It’s like they’re saying, ‘This bar doesn’t have the kind of craft beer that I like, so I’m going to drink bleach instead. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
That was a battle fought out in the nineteenth century between John Stuart Mill and Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (Stephen J) and in the middle of the last century between Professor Herbert Hart and Sir Patrick Devlin (Devlin J). [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:22 am
See In re Southeastern Equipment Co. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:21 am by SHG
  Oh wait, we’re not invited there either. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 2:19 pm by Matthew D. Lee
Coinbase has vigorously resisted the John Doe summons, and the matter has been in litigation for the past year. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Schachtman
  In re Silica Products Liab. [read post]
By the time it was decided, as future Justice Robert H. [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
For example, now-failed presidential candidate John Kasich’s entire economic plan revolved around adopting a balanced budget amendment to the United States Constitution, without ever explaining why that would be a good policy—or, more importantly, how we should actually change our fiscal policies to live withi [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Then, when John Bolton offered to testify, there was a flurry of Republicans publicly saying that the testimony should be heard, followed by dithering, quickly ending with “We don’t need to hear this at all, because we’re not going to convict him, no matter what. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:26 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Despite almost 40 years of practicing immigration law, I didn’t anticipate the robustly revanchist re-grabbing of lost immigration territory and status, or the truly audacious intent and breadth of the April 18, 2017 “Presidential Executive Order on Buy American and Hire American (BAHA). [read post]