Search for: "In re McConnell"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,059
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
Mitch McConnell (R-KY), the Institute for Justice and the National Rifle Association, the case was re-argued. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 10:41 am
I say that because we get a lot of questions about what kind of right passengers have when the car they’re riding in gets into an accident. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:03 am
What lawmakers said about USA FREEDOM, and what they are saying now, gives us some idea of where we’re headed over the next few months. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
One Sunday each month OnPoint Legal Research provides Slaw with an extended summary of, and counsel’s commentary on, an important case from the British Columbia, Alberta, or Ontario court of appeal. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
” In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371(Fed. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 11:06 am
Like we did last year, we're once again doing something extra in this respect. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
[In the spirit of full disclosure I should note that Michael McConnell represents the raisin farmers, and he was once my boss, and remains a friend. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
The below article of mine is an updated version of a year-end review article (with its original title) that was published in the November 25, 2014 edition of the Pennsylvania Law Weekly and is republished here with permission from the Publisher, American Law Media:THE MORE THINGS CHANGE, THE MORE THEY REMAIN THE SAME:A Review of Important Civil Litigation Cases and Trends in 2014By Daniel E. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The below article of mine is an updated version of a year-end review article (with its original title) that was published in the November 25, 2014 edition of the Pennsylvania Law Weekly and is republished here with permission from the Publisher, American Law Media:THE MORE THINGS CHANGE, THE MORE THEY REMAIN THE SAME:A Review of Important Civil Litigation Cases and Trends in 2014By Daniel E. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:35 am
You never hear it from Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Chuck Grassley (the incoming Chairman of SJC), or Bob Goodlatte (the once-and-future Chairman of HJC). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:11 am
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I’m going to be talking to McConnell and Boehner, Reid and Pelosi, and making a strong case on the merits as to why this has to get done. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re argues that, if the Court were once again to grant review in Fisher v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:10 am
Only one bite at the apple.In his recent decision in the case of McConnell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 8:49 am
Mitch McConnell and I are too savvy for that. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:33 pm
Justice Alito’s majority opinion clearly began as a draft written to overrule Abood that was then re-tooled once he realized he didn’t have the votes to overturn the decision. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
We’re a nation of immigrants. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:13 am
So, if you’re an employer who thought Tuesday night’s results were awesome, keep enjoying, but don’t succumb to “irrational exuberance. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 12:18 pm
I think they’re both safe: chances are, things aren’t going to change in either direction nearly as much as people want to say they will, members of Congress included. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
We’re not entirely sure, but to some extent not discussing damages means not discussing losing. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 5:48 pm
As we noted earlier today, documents bearing on the In Re Directives litigation have now been declassified. [read post]
