Search for: "In re P. F." Results 621 - 640 of 4,143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2021, 7:50 am by Christopher Tyner
  See generally In re White, 463 P.3d 802, 814 (Cal. 2020) (also declining to reach the latter question; discussing categories of felony cases excepted from the state constitution’s explicit general right to bail). [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 11:34 am by John Lewis
The 2013 Ninth Circuit opinion in In re Wal-Mart Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litigation, 737 F.3d 1262 (9th Cir. 2017), even if correct, did not reach the issue before the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
PÉNAL (DROIT) — infraction — autres infractions pénales — article 32 C.prof. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 7:02 am
Manigand, Que reste-t-il de la Fédération européenne de l’entre-deux-guerres ? [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
As a drug lawyer in Minnesota, the phrase, “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure,” comes to mind frequently. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Though one might focus on decisions made by the two key actors, John F. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Some notes on vexing issue, which fortunately has never serious issue for me. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
 For the last several months I have been sharing sneak peeks of a book to be published in early 2021: Hong Kong Between 'One Country' and 'Two Systems':  Essays from the Year that Transformed the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (June 2019 – June 2020)  (Little Sir Press). [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 11:26 am by Jonathan Chong
J’explique (en anglais) que la Cour d’appel fédérale a confirmé le jugement de première instance que les revendications d’un brevet relatif au secteur de l’exploration de pétrole sont valides et contrefaites. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
(If you're a public figure, assume I know that this is so.) [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am by Russell Knight
If you’re a parent in Illinois and no court has deemed you “unfit” you will be presumed to be a fit parent. [read post]