Search for: "In re William M." Results 621 - 640 of 3,407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2019, 8:41 am by Daniel Shaviro
Now I'm taxed at the capital gains rate rather than the dividend rate (today they're the same, but at the time CG rates were much lower), plus I get some basis recovery with respect to the cash company's stock. [read post]
And this isn’t foreign policy—I’m asking them to do an investigation that they’re doing already and that other people are telling them to stop. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
I hope the following links, excerpts, comments, and reflections (in no particular order) will prove of interest for one reason or another to our readers. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm by Gordon Ahl
Williams from whom the committee heard this morning, Morrison emerged from the call troubled. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm by Ben Berwick, Justin Florence
  Looking to the original meaning of “bribery” in the Constitution, the Journal cites three legal sources—William Blackstone, the Founding-era Jacob’s Law Dictionary and a remark by Goveurneur Morris during the Constitutional Convention—for the proposition that impeachment clause “bribery” was understood narrowly as requiring a consummated exchange. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:57 am by Kent Scheidegger
The probation office had conferred with Francisco's then-lawyer, John M. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 7:55 pm by Margaret Taylor, Benjamin Wittes
And this isn’t foreign policy — I’m asking them to do an investigation that they’re doing already and that other people are telling them to stop. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:20 am by SHG
Our own identities have evolved in such a way that, because we’re not merely trying to survive — I’m not saying we’re not trying to pay our rent and everything — but because we’re not identified with merely trying to survive, our sense of survival, our sense of thriving is embedded in a sense of movement and spaciousness and increasing allowance for more and more difference that is in direct conflict with people that are in a… [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
I appreciate the judge's argument on this, but I'm inclined to think that criminal libel laws that punish knowing lies that damage reputation are constitutional; here's the analysis from my forthcoming Anti-Libel Injunctions article: Criminal libel laws are constitutional if they are consistent with First Amendment libel law mens rea rules (generally speaking, if they require a showing of defendant's "actual malice"[1]). [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:48 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
On Ukraine, I’m not even sure what we’re dealing with is all that bad, much less impeachable. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
We’re grateful to learn of a legal historians' brief in Comcast Corporation, Petitioner v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 7:14 pm by Howard Bashman
Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times reports that “Appeals court to re-hear Trump emoluments case. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
If we’re able to agree as well as they did, I’d say we’re doing all right. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:11 am by Dale Carpenter
We're saying, if you read the words "because of sex" and you ask, in 1964, what did those words mean? [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:07 pm by Mark Walsh
“I understand what you’re saying, but I have a problem because …” she starts off with Crouse. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:19 am by Riana Pfefferkorn
  Late last week, Attorney General William Barr and the acting secretary of Homeland Security joined British and Australian officials in a letter to Facebook head Mark Zuckerberg that asked Facebook not to go forward with its plan to implement end-to-end encryption across its messaging services. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 pm by David Post
  I'm not the only one who thinks that there just might be—might be—a more detailed account of exactly what President Trump said in that July 25th phone call, am I? [read post]