Search for: "Jacobs v Grant"
Results 621 - 640
of 820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the county and its officials. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 2:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:39 am
Murray v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:29 am
The Gap, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
Two important developments in European law have undermined any argument that there is a substantial policy reason for the view that actions for infringement of intellectual property rights cannot be brought outside the State in which they are granted or subsist. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:56 am
Thanks to Jacob Cremer (Florida Land Environment blog) for the tip. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:31 am
In this case, he wants the Court of Appeals to grant his in forma pauperis motion. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:57 am
Court of Federal Claims' (“COFC”) decision in Jacobs Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:06 pm
Jacob Sherkow argues that it does in his forthcoming article, Negativing Invention. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:02 am
Jacobs in the Second Circuit, and Judge Brett Kavanaugh in the D.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
See Newell Com- panies, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
It appears that the only evidence before the Opposition Division on this point was a declaration of Dr Plückthun (which is not in evidence before me) and Professor Smith’s grant application. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Judge Nealon likewise primarily relied upon the tripartite test enunciated in Jacobs v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:52 am
Judge Minora noted that the case of Jacobs v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Feb. 7, 2008), but rehearing was granted on other grounds (preemption), and the Despain opinion no longer exists. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
Manning, Jacob S. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:25 am
Two decades before Smith, Wisconsin v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
(Patently-O) Why patentees should avoid exceeding page limits (Patents Post Grant) Congress considered changes to Rule 11 sanctions (Patent Law Practice Center) US Patents – Decisions 8th Circuit: Who is the client? [read post]
10 May 2011, 6:41 am
This is one of those cases.The case is United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
The press have fulminated against privacy injunctions – without actually suggesting that any of them have been wrongly granted. [read post]
