Search for: "John Doe et al" Results 621 - 640 of 1,472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2014, 7:39 am by Schachtman
” 39 Wake Forest Law Rev. at 306-07 & n.61 (citing only one paper, Lisa Licitra et al., Primary Chemotherapy in Resectable Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 21 J. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Feldman et al. count patent monetizers corresponding to CKS categories 2 through 5, and 7. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
If the entity continues unchanged but its former owners and managers are replaced, to whom does the attorney-client privilege run? [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
This motion does not address the questionable merits of [Pearson's] claims. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
[2] We conclude that the offence does not require proof that the accused’s threats were conveyed to their subject or that someone was actually intimidated by them. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:47 am by Bill Marler
Approximately 12% of asymptomatic food handlers were carriers for one of the norovirus genotypes. [28] This was the first report of norovirus molecular epidemiology relating asymptomatic individuals to outbreaks, suggesting that asymptomatic individuals are an important link in the infectivity pathway. [15, 28] Asymptomatic infection may occur because some people may have acquired immunity, which explains why some show symptoms upon infection and some do not. [16, 28, 33] Such immunity does… [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
But this alternative does not so much displace as extend conventional constitutional theory as a set of static premises that structure the organization of legitimate governance units. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm by Brian Price
. : (JUDGE MANNION) FRAC TECH SERVICES, LLC, : et al., : Defendants : : MEMORANDUM Presently before the court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint under Fed. [read post]