Search for: "John T. Day, III" Results 621 - 640 of 1,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
(The latter website *totally* has theme music, which is, appropriately enough, Elton John’s “Philadelphia Freedom. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:00 am
  Why was a Division III woman's basketball game between Mount St. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Those were halcyon days for Colorado Democrats. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Bissell
” He also noted that “the law hasn’t kept pace with technology, and this disconnect has created a significant public safety problem. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Roy Black
In the way that although you know that one day you will die, you live as though you won’t. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 9:00 pm by Cody Poplin
Bellinger III, Sarah Knuckey, James Ross, and Scott Shane. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:38 am by Michael Lowe
This month, the Innocence Project filed a grievance with the State Bar of Texas against Navarro County District Attorney John H. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 6:27 am by Jim Sedor
Florida – Why Won’t Florida GOP Leaders Talk about Hunting Trips to King Ranch in Texas? [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:03 am by Nietzer
This is because “At the end of the day the policy needs to be complied with. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
With its order in the Wheaton College case, the Supreme Court invited the federal government to develop a regulatory fix that might both satisfy the nonprofit challengers to the contraceptive coverage rule and at the same time guarantee that the women who work for those employers will continue to receive cost-free contraceptive coverage. [read post]