Search for: "Jonathan"
Results 621 - 640
of 25,911
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 10:55 am
FOOTNOTES [i] Government Contracting Companies Beware: DOJ’s Procurement Collusion Strike Force is Global, Growing, and Going Strong, by Ann O’Brien & Lindsey Collins (June 22, 2023) Lessons For Gov’t Contractors Amid Increased Antitrust Risk, by Rachel Guy & James McGinnis (Law360 – May 18, 2022) Executives Beware: DOJ Antitrust Division is Taking a Hard Look at a Wide Spectrum of Potential Criminal Violations, by Thomas Dillickrath & Joe Jay (March 7,… [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:29 am
Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan explain, in The New York Times. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor seemed skeptical about one argument made by Trump’s attorney, Jonathan Mitchell, that Chief Justice Samuel Chase’s circuit court decision in Griffin required Congress to pass enabling legislation to allow states to disqualify insurrectionists. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
Indeed, the amazing thing about the oral argument was just how hilariously nonchalant Jackson was with regard the mass of historical materials by lawyers and non-lawyers she had been furnished; she even had Trump’s attorney Jonathan Mitchell disclaiming “law office history” to avoid using history to serve his side so crudely. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:46 am
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Artificial Intelligence and Patents: An International Perspective on Patenting AI-Related Inventions by Jonathan P. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Sarah Eichenberger and Jonathan Rotenberg are partners at the law firm of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP. [read post]
Don’t Judge a Range by its Cover: Federal Circuit Sides with Patentee on Written Description Support
11 Feb 2024, 9:43 am
.; Jonathan M. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
“A very un-Trumpy performance delivers for Trump at Supreme Court; Jonathan Mitchell’s argument to the justices had none of the bombast that other Trump lawyers often deploy”: Josh Gerstein of Politico has this report. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
And, perhaps to no one's surprise, Jonathan Mitchell resisted any effort to reconcile these doctrines. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin’s Case and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts; Why did Jonathan Mitchell not vigorously defend Griffin’s Case and Chief Justice Chase? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
[Why did Jonathan Mitchell not vigorously defend Griffin's Case and Chief Justice Chase? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Trump’s arguments Legal counsel for Trump, Jonathan Mitchell, began oral arguments with a short statement. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" She asked Jonathan Mitchell, "So are you arguing both in this case or just one? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:53 am
Kane distinguished professor of law, University of Kansas School of Law; MacKenzie Mallon, provenance specialist, The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art; Lauren Van Schilfgaarde, assistant professor of law, UCLA School of Law; and Jonathan Zwibel, deputy associate chief counsel, U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
Jonathan Mitchell, however, gave none of these answers to Justice Gorsuch's questions. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
[The jury found no real damages, but gave a sizeable punitive award that could be challenged on appeal. ] Yesterday, a jury in the District of Columbia ruled for climate scientist Michael Mann in his long-running defamation suit against writers Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg, for blog posts the two had written challenging the validity of his research and comparing Penn State's investigation into Mann's alleged misconduct with the University's whitewash of Jerry Sandusky. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:25 am
[Things you may have missed between the Trump disqualification case, Biden special counsel report, and NBA trade deadline.] [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Thus, I was a bit surprised that his attorney Jonathan Mitchell opened yesterday's oral argument by reciting what I regard as one of Trump's weakest objections: the claim that the President is not "an officer of the United States" within the meaning of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.You don't have to take my word for it that this is as bad an argument as it appears to be. [read post]
