Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 88,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2015, 8:02 am by The Federalist Society
Rees is applicable when states are using a different execution protocol than the one involved in Baze v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:15 am by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
Drug Enforcement Administration announced that Epidiolex has been classified as a Schedule V drug, legal for sale in the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 8:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, affording the legal malpractice cause of action a liberal construction and according the plaintiff every favorable inference, the complaint does state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see generally Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; Maiolini v McAdams & Fallon, P.C., 61 AD3d 644, 645; Malik v Beal, 54 AD3d 910, 911). [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:54 pm by Utah Criminal Defense Blog
Why An Attorney Can Help You The case of State of Utah v Milligan is an excellent example of why you would want to have an experienced Utah criminal defense attorney assist you in any legal problems you might encounter. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
  Here, in Terio v Spodek ;  2009 NY Slip Op 04412 Decided on June 2, 2009 ; Appellate Division, Second Department  we see how that might happen:   "To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove, inter alia, the existence of an attorney-client relationship (see Velasquez v Katz, 42 AD3d 566, 567; Moran v Hurst, 32 AD3d 909; Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378, 380; Volpe v Canfield,… [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 3:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Volpe v Munoz & Assoc., LLC  2021 NY Slip Op 00516 Decided on January 28, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department gives a bullet point review of how this case failed: “The complaint fails to state a cause of action for legal malpractice. [read post]