Search for: "Levi v Levi" Results 621 - 640 of 3,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
This article from the LA Times notes that jeans maker Levi’s was quick to respond when it discovered its brand was discovered on pirate sites, taking steps with its global ad agency to prevent future ads from showing up on such sites. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 4:16 am by SHG
” There is, of course, one thing “like this” that has been done in this country, but it goes all the way back to the now-canceled Chief Justice John Marshall, when President Andrew Jackson was reputed to have said in response to Worcester v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 7:15 am
The independent contractor v employee situation has only come up once before in litigation in the long history of the WWE, when they were sued for sexual harassment by former female wrestler Nicole Bass. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Paul Alan Levy (Public Citizen) and Oliver Edwards are defending against the claims (in Joe Johnson v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the Appellate Division said that in such situations “courts are not permitted to review an arbitrator's findings of fact, including credibility determinations. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff was unaware of any prior history of relationships and/or transactions among Mashkanta, Mascolo, Levy and Nau at the time he retained Levy and Nau to represent him. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:09 pm
"From the WaPo article (by Robert Barnes):In 1969, the Supreme Court famously held in Tinker v. [read post]