Search for: "Long v. Frank"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 9:52 am
He earned a spot on the Apollo 8 space mission as the youngest member, alongside Frank Borman and Jim Lovell. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
Uriarte v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:34 am
There’s nothing particularly new or ground-breaking about the recent Ontario Superior Court Decision in Sierra Excavating v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:58 pm
Department for Business, Energy and Industry Strategy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:12 am
Toolson v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
Yet for a long time this “puzzle” has been largely reserved to academic debates.[2] Indeed, case law addressing challenges to agency adjudication on Article III or Seventh Amendment grounds has been sparse.[3] Until recently. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:29 am
" It is seemingly defined as Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said of pornography, "I know it when I see it" in Jacobellis v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 9:27 pm
TweetOver the next week or so I’ll hopefully be catching up on a few things that I haven’t been able to get to from the last several weeks, the first being the new Nasdaq and NYSE compensation committee listing standards: By way of background, Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act amended the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by adding new Section 10C which requires that the Securities and Exchange Commission adopt rules directing the… [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 10:04 am
In Cuenca v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 9:36 am
In Panzera v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:49 am
See SEC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:27 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:18 pm
"); cf. also Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
(Reporting by Marc Frank; Editing by Lincoln Feast.) [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court case that upheld sobriety checkpoints (Michigan v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 2:39 pm
In a recent Illinois case, State Auto Property Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 9:07 am
Copyright (c) 2008 by John V. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark Dombroff of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Supreme Court rules induced infringement requires a 271(a) direct infringer (Limelight v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
After a long, long journey through the court systems, in November of last year the Arkansas Supreme Court unanimously ruled the West Memphis Three were entitled to hearings on whether they could use Arkansas’ DNA exoneration statute for post-conviction DNA testing. [read post]
