Search for: "MATTER OF D R B" Results 621 - 640 of 5,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2013, 7:43 am
Indianapolis, IN - Patent lawyers for Mid-West Metal Products Company, Inc. d/b/a Midwest Homes for Pets of Muncie, IN sued Yuntek International, Inc. of Hayward, CA seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and intervening rights regarding Yuntek's "Pet Tent," Patent No. 6,715,446, issued by the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:43 am by Adam Cooke
  As an initial matter, the court rejected D-Link’s arguments that challenged the FTC’s authority to assert an unfairness claim as well as the FTC’s basis for bringing such a claim. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:43 am by Adam Cooke
  As an initial matter, the court rejected D-Link’s arguments that challenged the FTC’s authority to assert an unfairness claim as well as the FTC’s basis for bringing such a claim. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:05 am by Eliana Baer
… While the above-mentioned Arbitration Questionnaire has been adjudged fulfilled by the same criteria set forth in the body of any such Agreement to Arbitrate, pursuant to the Comment to R. 5:1-5 “….Appendix XXIX-D [form arbitrator/umpire disclosure] is mandatory by this rule and R. 5:1-4. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:50 am by Russell Knight
R. 237(b) Being called into the principal’s office is bad enough…but this notice can make you bring homework, too. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 3:34 pm
  So far as I can tell, subsection (c) simply prohibits a particular type of direct adversity, in which  client B has an interest in the matter in which the lawyer represents client A, and B's interest in that matter is directly adverse to A's interest. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 10:05 pm by Jason Shinn
In January 2011, Richard Slusher, an orthopedic surgeon, signed a one-year contract with Shelbyville Hospital Corporation, d/b/a Heritage Medical Center. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In many others, where the risk is still emerging, D&O insurers are watching the developments closely. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
As an initial matter, the Sixth Circuit observed that it had never interpreted Sec. 553.226, and, to its knowledge, no other court had considered how to construe Sec. 553.226(a) in conjunction with Sec. 553.226(b). [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:34 am by Vanessa Schoenthaler
, an order to cease and desist from violations of Exchange Act Rule 105 would not trigger disqualification under Rule 506(d)(1)(v), even though Rule 105 is promulgated under Exchange Act Section 10(b)). [260.21] Rule 506(d)(2)(iii) is self-executing and, as such, if an order, judgement or decree is issued by a court or regulator in accordance with Rule 506(d)(2)(iii) advising that disqualification from Rule 506 should not arise as a consequence of the order,… [read post]