Search for: "Marks v. Thomas"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 9:14 am
Not because it's "scandalous" or "immoral," since the Supreme Court struck down that trademark restriction on First Amendment grounds in Iancu v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:50 am
Roberts Jr., Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Stephen G. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:38 am
The Supreme Court released its opinion in Teva v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 8:04 am
Notably, "blanket exemptions for particular types of documents are inimical to FOIL's policy of open government" (Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, 275 [1996]; accord Matter of Thomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 103 AD3d 495, 498 [2013]; Matter of New York State Defenders Assn. v New York State Police, 87 AD3d 193, 196 [2011]), and the agency must "articulat[e] a particularized and specific justification for denying… [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:00 am
Sidenote: There's another Supreme Court case that could be seen as a bridge between Sherbert and Hobbie that readers may find helpful: Thomas v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:00 am
Sidenote: There's another Supreme Court case that could be seen as a bridge between Sherbert and Hobbie that readers may find helpful: Thomas v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:55 pm
In reading Justice Alito’s dissent in Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:26 pm
Two weeks ago I posted some hypotheses about why it was taking the Supreme Court such an unusually long time to publish the opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
Thomas McCarthy points out, “[t]he Majority essentially creates a hard edged rule that no one can use a ‘famous’ mark (or one so similar that there is an ‘association’) as a mark for any product or service that a court thinks is ‘sex-related. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:35 pm
The Queen v Louis Riel / With an introduction by Desmond Morton. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:57 am
Yet a number of hearings have left their mark on the Supreme Court nomination process. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Ginsburg, dissented. [read post]
CA9: Stop suppressed as based on a hunch and represented at suppression hearing as a mere conclusion
18 May 2012, 4:50 am
Id.; Thomas, 211 F.3d at 1189-92. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
A tale of Dudes and Smoothies Katfriend Richard Kempner discusses Fresh Trading Limited v Deepend Fresh Recovery Limited and Andrew Thomas Robert Chappell [2015] EWHC 52 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision addressing the copyright ownership in the ‘Dude’, ie the logo used on Innocent’s smoothie bottle in the past 15 years. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) and Rep. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm
Cline, Mark H. [read post]
