Search for: "Matter of Barnette" Results 621 - 640 of 1,005
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 9:52 am by Lawrence Solum
Defenders and critics of judicially enforceable constitutional rights typically argue on grounds of political morality, contending that democratic legal systems should (or should not) adopt constitutional rights as a matter of policy. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Judge Rakoff’s insistence that requiring “statistical significance” at the customary 5% level would change the plaintiffs’ burden of proof, and require greater certitude for epidemiologists than for other expert witnesses who opine in less “rigorous” fields of learning, is wrong as a matter of fact. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:22 am by Rick Hills
But striking down the individual mandate on the grounds proffered by Florida has zero practical effect on the power of the federal government, which, under Florida's (aka Randy Barnett's) theory, could impose practically the same mandate on private individuals to buy health insurance just so long as the mandate was conditioned on some commercial activity -- say, working at a job affecting interstate commerce. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:41 pm by Andrew Ramonas
He will center his work at Steptoe on telecommunications, energy, environmental and health care matters. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:01 pm by Tom Withers
As we’ve previously discussed the most productive AUSA in Atlanta for the last several years has been Justin Anand, and he prosecuted this matter. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Randy Barnett  and Keith Whittington  have played prominent roles in the development of the “New Originalism. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:16 pm by Lawrence Solum
With a fair gamble (e.g. a roll of unloaded dice), the outcome doesn't matter. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:02 am by Douglas Keene
Sabrica Barnett did some research on what whites assume when they see a biracial other. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 4:32 pm by Randy Barnett
It is of no matter that they are commandeered at other times—e.g., jury duty, the draft, etc. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) I recently finished reading Pauline Maier’s marvelous book, Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:07 pm by Geoffrey Manne
” As a general matter, antitrust law treats such self-interested claims of competitors with the skepticism they deserve. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:38 pm by Geoffrey Manne
” As a general matter, antitrust law treats such self-interested claims of competitors with the skepticism they deserve. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 7:43 pm by Ian Bartrum
  And when we turn to structure, I don’t think Barnett or Sandefur’s objections present much of a worry. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 2:05 am by INFORRM
  He made it clear that he would not give evidence on matters relating to phone hacking. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm by JB
This is a central claim of New Originalists like Randy Barnett, Larry Solum, and myself. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:55 am by JB
What is fixed matters to correct constitutional interpretation.This definition comfortably includes all of the various schools of originalism existing today. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Watson was consulting the House of Commons Speaker following Roy Greenslade’s claim on Media Matters radio that committee members had been followed by private investigators working for News of the World. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:04 am by Paul Horwitz
 In the Tea Party Constitution realm, that figure is clearly Randy Barnett. [read post]