Search for: "Matter of Fisher" Results 621 - 640 of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2010, 2:58 pm by rreeves
The Reeves Law Group is not acting as legal counsel for any party in the matters discussed in this posting. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 20, 2007 Fisher v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:18 am
" For example, she described a 1929 decision, Fisher v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
Deciding which is right could be as simple as a matter of convenience. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 4:04 am
Specifically, defense attorneys for Mattel and Fisher-Price argued non-California Plaintiffs could not bring claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law (commonly referred to as “section 17200”) and under the CLRA, id. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
He specializes in commercial litigation and currently represents the owners of Toyota and Lexus vehicles in the first-filed class action relating to sudden unintended acceleration, along with co-counsel McCuneWright LLP and Hanly Conroy Bierstein Sheridan Fisher & Hayes LLP. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 8:11 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, the judge said that the issue of whether that copying rises to the level of infringement was a matter for a trial. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:12 am by gavin.n.johnson
Fisher and Ury described the four fundamental rules for principled negotiations: 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:22 am by emagraken
 Madam Justice Fisher rejected much of the Plaintiff’s claim awarding of $61,532. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 1:52 pm
No matter how you slice it, IP addresses aren't just phone numbers - they are content rich, and are a far cry from simple pen register data. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
Fisher, a habeas case involving a question of timing for federal habeas petitioners, for this blog; at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to Little’s post. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
“When assessing Charter rights related to representation by publicly funded counsel, the test is simply whether counsel is ‘sufficiently qualified to deal with the matter at issue,’ not whether counsel is the better or best qualified lawyer,” Stromberg-Stein reasoned.She cited the Rowbotham and Fisher applications, but noted that few courts today follow Fisher. [read post]