Search for: "Matter of Hollands"
Results 621 - 640
of 971
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
Holland America has made it perfectly clear to us that they feel they have no responsibility in the matter, and even if they did have any liability, that their interests are fully protected by the Death on the High Seas Act. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:12 pm
Witnesses included: Reps Kristi Noem and Robert Hurt; Gina McCarthy, EPA Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation; and representatives from: National Cattlemen's Beef Association; American Farm Bureau Federation; National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association; Holland & Knight (on behalf of: Coarse Particulate Matter Coalition); Columbia University; Brown University; and Natural Resources Defense Council. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:50 am
Explain troll litigation to them and, to the extent that you can without waiving privilege, explain how you handle the cases and the company’s statistical history with troll matters. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:50 am
Explain troll litigation to them and, to the extent that you can without waiving privilege, explain how you handle the cases and the company’s statistical history with troll matters. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:37 am
Bingham partner Gary Slaiman, who is handling his firm’s Google account, lobbied the Senate on competition matters. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:11 am
Hollander, 607 So.2d 412, 414 (Fla.1992). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The court issued the order, and Prism sought to have it annulled on the grounds that Prism and Arilco Holland had already settled the matter in Belgium (the receiver “challenged that financial settlement in detail”, which I think means that he denied that the matter had been settled in the way Prism claimed). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:55 am
The Seattle Times reports that the husband of a cruise passenger filed a wrongful death suit Holland America Line in Seattle after his wife was killed during a cruise sponsored snorkeling excursion. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:30 am
(The SPC Blog) Portugal: Lisbon Commercial Court (first instance) revokes INPI decision which had rejected the registration IMUNID due to the existence of likelihood of confusion with previous CTM IMMUNIQ, both referring to “Dietetic substances adapted for medical use” (Class 46) Portugal: Pharmaceutical patent litigation in Portugal (PatLit) South Africa: TK legislation in the new tradition (IP Watch) US: FDA approval of biologics under 505(b)(2) expected to increase (Patent Docs) US:… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:32 am
In August 2007, Arilco Holland was declared isolvent. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
Affirming the Third Circuit’s decision in this matter will foster that goal. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:37 am
The court backpedaled from that a bit last year in Holland v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:13 pm
Lessman Katz advises domestic and international clients regarding privacy and data security matters including cross-border transfers, licensing and related technology transactions, outsourcing, e-commerce transactions, and emerging issues with social media. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:54 am
We've committed a predictable number of rookie traveller errors in Holland over the past few days. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 10:57 am
Google paid the firm $80,000 to lobby the Senate and House on competition, privacy and copyright matters from July 1 to Sept. 30, according to the filing. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:08 am
Through the years, I have seen other junior attorneys take on much more responsibility in pro bono matters than they would otherwise be given for a paying clients. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:19 am
When these homes do not have the employees required to provide necessary services, then the development of things like pressure sores are just a matter of time. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:06 pm
Case New Holland, Inc., 566 F.3d 1372, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:00 pm
-based CPS Professional Services on matters involving "contracting at the Federal Aviation Administration. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:52 am
Holland, 346 U.S. 379, 382 (1953) (citation omitted). [read post]
