Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 621 - 640
of 16,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2019, 9:26 am
” [I have to admit, I don't get why the difference should matter to the descriptive fair use analysis. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 10:01 pm
One said: “We can’t fight them. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:43 am
Former Luzerne County Judge Mark Ciavarella has been transferred and settled into a medium security federal prison in Illinois. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
Case T‑394/10, Elena Grebenshikova v OHIM, Volvo Trademark Holding AB intervening, is a fascinating decision of the General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) on 5 December. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
D argued he hadn’t used it as a mark, but the position of the logo on the website is where the consumer would expect it to be. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:22 am
And so the Board reversed the refusal to register.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: I wouldn't call this opinion a jewel of clarity. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:04 pm
The USPTO refused to grant Brunetti’s application to register the mark — finding that the mark “comprises immoral * * * or scandalous matter” and thus cannot be registered under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
From here you can edit the entry, add attendees, and/or mark the matter as billable. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:51 pm
I am reading once more Jeremy Waldron’s wonderful book, Law and Disagreement (1999), the complementary volume to his equally worthy Seeley Lectures, published as The Dignity of Legislation (1999) (for the record, I don’t share Waldron’s thoughts—or those of Larry Kramer or Mark Tushnet for that matter—on judicial review), which is relevant to several things I’m working on, but especially toward completing a couple of reviews of recent… [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:13 pm
It’s easy to say that safe havens don’t matter if everywhere is a safe haven. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:45 am
Thus the defense was not available as a procedural matter. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:04 am
It didn’t “adopt” a similar mark at all; it compared its products to those of APT. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Such an agreement says in effect "we don't believe that there is a likelihood of confusion, please take our word for it. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am
If the statute has certain factors in it, and it doesn’t have other factors in it, and the court considers extraneous matters, isn’t that subject to appellate review? [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
Mar. 30, 2017)Some mention of my previous blogging on the issue, but that doesn’t matter to the ultimate result (though the court at least notices the incontestability problem). [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 1:24 am
What matters more, to me and I bet to more than a few others, is what she's done in those jobs. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
First, most of the statements at issue predated the registration date for the mark (though that really shouldn’t matter since trademark rights depend on use, not registration). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 6:21 pm
And as a matter of law the PTO can’t register two marks that are likely to be confused. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:38 pm
For prior posts on the matter, click here, here and here. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:52 pm
Stop mass surveillance of digital communications and communication records.It doesn’t matter what legal authority is being cited—whether it’s the Patriot Act, the FISA Amendments Act, or an executive order—the government should not be sweeping up massive amounts of information by and about innocent people first, then sorting out whether any of its targets are included later. [read post]
