Search for: "Matter of Martinez" Results 621 - 640 of 1,044
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 7:10 pm by Zachary Spilman
While the facts of Ballan are a little different from Leubecker, Roberts, and Martinez, where the accused pleaded guilty to a charged, but faulty, specification, it might not matter in the end. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
 His broad experience in accident law, including aviation matters, and an understanding of technology allow Attorney Brod to serve drone injury clients and advocate on their behalf. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Matter of Garraway v Fischer, 106 AD3d 1301, 1301 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 864 [2013]; Eklund v Pinkey, 27 AD3d 878, 879 [2006]). [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:52 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new case, involving a child sexual abuse prosecution in Arizona, is Martinez v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Hurles 14-191Issue: (1) Whether, under this Court's decision in Martinez v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:35 am by SHG
Colorado District Judge William Martinez says “nope. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:15 am by SHG
Martinez is in an unusual position, however. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ricardo Martinez, Case No. 12-20316-CR-Martinez This indictment charges defendant Ricardo Martinez with health care fraud and paying kickbacks to patients. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Martinez Ramirez to allow Arizona to put to death two men who alleged ineffective assistance of counsel at both the trial and post-conviction stages of their journeys through the state court system. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm by Law Lady
HERNANDEZ, PEDRO JOSE MARTINEZ, WILLIAMS ARIELLO GALANTINO, JOSE DE LA CRUZ CARDENAS, on their own behalf and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 Where the motion papers demonstrate that the defendant’s right to testify before the grand jury has not been “scrupulously protected,” the “mandatory language” of CPL § 190.50(5) “creates what is a ministerial duty on the part of the court to dismiss an indictment obtained in violation of a defendant’s right to appear before the Grand Jury” (Matter of Borrello v Balbach, 112 AD2d 1051 [2nd Dept 1985]; see also, People v Mason, 176… [read post]