Search for: "PROPERTIES FOUR, INC. v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 1,983
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
For tangible personal property in Ohio prior to the four-year pro rata phasedown of the tax under HB 66, that rate was 25 percent for manufacturing machinery, equipment, furniture, and fixtures and 23 percent for inventory.[15] The structure of the state’s nine-bracket individual income tax remained the same under HB 66, but the rates did not. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:55 am by Stephen Bilkis
(c) a non-domiciliary alien except one who is a foreign guardian as provided in subdivision four of section one thousand seven hundred sixteen of this chapter, or one who shall serve with one or more co-fiduciaries, at least one of whom is resident in this state. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:16 pm by James Yang
Displays Inc., 532 U.S. 23, 58 USPQ2d 1001, 1006 (2001) (quoting Inwood Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:16 pm by James Yang
Displays Inc., 532 U.S. 23, 58 USPQ2d 1001, 1006 (2001) (quoting Inwood Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 8:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Circuit concluded that the employer did not unlawfully have three union representatives arrested after they refused to leave its premises (Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
Conservation Active farmers may be able to presently deduct the cost of conservation practices implemented as part of an NRCS-approved (or comparable state) plan. [read post]