Search for: "People v Holder"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor's most quoted line in her 2004 plurality opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:15 pm
Large donations can entrench office-holders against challengers. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBusiness LawAmerican Holder of ADRs in Dutch Bank Lacks Standing to Bring Derivative Suit Against Directors Seybold v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:30 am
As the Supreme Court held in State Farm v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 10:11 pm
Jones Day v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 1:34 am
When ACT publishes pictures of its events, you see very small numbers of people--and mostly ACT staff and service providers.While I have disagreed with the FSA in some contexts (such as Continental v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:07 am
In the first two instance decisions, the District and Appeal Courts of Milan also acknowledged that the use of the "Ferrari" and "Ferrari Club" trade marks by the Club was atypical, non-distinctive of Ferrari S.p.A. and only eligible to communicate to the relevant public the existence of an association of people supporting Ferrari. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:41 am
Holder. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
A number of the briefs highlighted the recent Wolk v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 4:08 am
As I reported on Saturday, Waco-based Judge Alan Albright of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas denied an Intel motion to transfer or postpone the second VLSI v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
Holder, but we did get to hear a bit of what ended up being Robertson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 8:41 pm
Holder, 661 F.3d 1, 8–10 (D.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 5:25 am
We certainly didn't.The problem with using that method is that it could get you arrested, as Vincent Richardson discovered.In People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Internet poses new challenges to trademark holders, but equitable jurisdiction cannot solve all their problems. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:39 am
It offers courses designed and given by itself not the trademark holder. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:50 pm
In Fish v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:41 am
Discussion Of the rights afforded to the patent holder (“Holder”) none is more powerful than the right to an injunction.[7] Injunctive relief allows the Holder to obtain a court order requiring the defendant to cease any infringement, thereby protecting the aforementioned monetary interests which incentivize innovation. [read post]
