Search for: "People v. Brown" Results 621 - 640 of 3,383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  For Dworkin—and many American constitutional theorists of the second half of the twentieth century—the existing story made Brown v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
In People v Brown, 253 Mich 537; 235 NW 245 (1931), the Court noted that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulations, but stressed that such regulations “cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:39 am by Steve Sanders
He formerly practiced as a member of the Supreme Court and appellate group at Mayer Brown LLP, and represented twenty-three law and history professors as amici in Varnum v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am by David Oscar Markus
” As our country’s experience with stop-and-frisk vividly demonstrates, however, for police, reasonable suspicion is too often synonymous with being a Black or brown person in public.The practice of racially profiling Black drivers was effectively endorsed by the Court in the 1996 ruling in Whren v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:31 pm by NARF
McKee (Tribal Jurisdiction; Water Rights) Brown v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Dressed in brown leather aviator jacket, gold chain, hair down to shoulders United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court (Jurisdiction – Exhaustion of Tribal Court Remedies)Jamul Action Committee v Jonodev Chaudhuri (Indian Lands Eligible for Gaming)Tanner-Brown v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This guy won his habeas petition in the Sixth Circuit, but the Supreme Court has reversed and the defendant remains in jail.The case is Brown v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
 Neither does the status of the owner (living v. not living). [read post]
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]