Search for: "People v. Burnes" Results 621 - 640 of 1,756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2011, 5:58 am by Nathan Koppel
“Across the country, [prosecutors' offices] have been laying people off, furloughing prosecutors, and encouraging early retirement,” said Scott Burns, executive director of the National District Attorneys Association. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 8:37 am by Tom Smith
(Just days before, 1,000 or so people had demonstrated less than five miles away, in front of the state capitol.) [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:16 am by Hopkins
Sadly for RJ Reynolds, Kool cigarettes, manufactured by Phillip Morris, had been burning them on market share. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:16 am by Hopkins
Sadly for RJ Reynolds, Kool cigarettes, manufactured by Phillip Morris, had been burning them on market share. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:48 am by SHG
There is bad law, terrible law, like Graham v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Even if government were permitted to conjure an interest in support of the present prohibition on beer label speech, that prohibition would only be "another case of 'burn[ing] the house to roast the pig.'" Sable Commc's of Cal., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by admin
” The most familiar example of this comes from the Supreme Court’s 1989 case, Texas v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
In a 1966 decision, in a Hawaii state legislative redistricting case, Burns v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0287p.06 2007/07/30 Natl Sur Corp v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 10:47 am by Andres
ETA 2: Wired has published an interesting collection of videos of people describing Anonymous. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 1:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Burns was likely influenced by the 1995 judgement of the Constitutional Court of South Africa S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Isabel McArdle
Munim Abdul and Others v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 247 (Admin) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that prosecution of a group of people who had shouted slogans, including, “burn in hell”, “baby killers” and “rapists” at a parade of British soldiers, was not a breach of their right to freedom of expression, protected by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]