Search for: "People v. Hughes" Results 621 - 640 of 703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2017, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
The new space will allow each side to have 16 attorneys in the court room at a time, and it can accommodate a total of 132 people. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
How do people think about copyright? [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm by royblack
The Supreme Court again reversed the defendants’ convictions in Norris v Alabama. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Justin Hughes: Sampling problem may go away with tech. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, (IPRoo), WIPO Director General candidates’ presentations to members: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP rights arise in UN debate on the right to participate in cultural life: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP academies agree to galvanise efforts to promote IP education: (WIPO), What business people do to maximise protection of IP: (Ezine @rticles), Lorin Brennan’s memo on interaction between UNICITRAL guide and IP rights: (IP finance), … [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by INFORRM
Both writers argued in favour of the new single publication rule, which would bury the 160 year old common law authority, Duke of Brunswick v Harmer, that is the basis for the legal interpretation of every download of an online article as a new publication. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Law publishing industry veteran and innovator, Jason Wilson has been pondering on relevant matters as the case of ROSS v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:29 am by Emma Snell
Scott Patterson, Siobhan Hughes and Sadie Gurman report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
He's not just saying it would be a good idea to amend the law so there are penalties for copyfraud — many people say that. [read post]